|
OOC II
Oct 18, 2018 21:22:50 GMT 1
Post by Addam Velaryon on Oct 18, 2018 21:22:50 GMT 1
Confused: Bolts do 2 HK does 3 and brings my CD down to 12 Both SS now get 2 DoS with an AR of 7 that should only be that 2 damage from each That makes 9 damage total not 17
Also my AR 2 better then Balon's so should HK do 1 dmg since his opposite did 3 to Balon with the same amount of DoS
|
|
|
Post by Father on Oct 18, 2018 21:29:10 GMT 1
Actually, that's worse, that would be 2x9 damage from those, after AR.
So correct total damage would be 25.
Which you may ignore if you wish because when I make mistakes benefiting PC's against NPC's, I usually don't bother to correct them.
|
|
|
Post by Roland Cordwayner on Oct 18, 2018 21:32:50 GMT 1
Addam - looks like the Sellswords are 7 base damage (mattock is athletics +2, plus poweful). This then goes up to 8 as you're knocked down (which also explains why the HK hits you harder than Balon (who ably kept his feet - top work Ser!).
Now go get them Addam, he's right there! [Roland is sitting on Daeron's shoulders, Egg style to cheer you on!]
Might be worth spending a point of fatigue to ignore armour penalty for a round and boost defences?
Good luck troops, brave and heroic stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Balon Blackbriar on Oct 18, 2018 21:38:20 GMT 1
Time to see if the Hedge Knights can take injuries/wounds.
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 18, 2018 21:52:40 GMT 1
Post by Addam Velaryon on Oct 18, 2018 21:52:40 GMT 1
that just confused me even more So damage break down is -1 from bolt 1 -1 from bolt 2 -3 from HK -1 from SS 1 -9 from SS 2 -1 from bolt 3 -1 from bolt 4
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 18, 2018 22:01:06 GMT 1
Post by Roland Cordwayner on Oct 18, 2018 22:01:06 GMT 1
Looks correct to me.
As the narrator notes, the -1 from SS 1 should be 2 DoS (thanks to shattering 1 reducing your CD to 12 by the time the sell swords attacK) for -9 but that's being marked as an error in player's favour.
Good luck showing these brutes the Companion way!
|
|
|
Post by Titus Blackbriar on Oct 18, 2018 22:05:49 GMT 1
Take their eyes out!
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 18, 2018 22:14:29 GMT 1
Post by Roland Cordwayner on Oct 18, 2018 22:14:29 GMT 1
Also, remember that even if someone needs to take a wound this isn't crippling. Ser Mikel has nobly borne a wound for several days and still contributed mechanically due to a combination of hardiness and being high as a kite on milk of the poppy. It halves penalties (rounded down) so you can effectively tank a whole wound's worth of hits and not really be suffering mechanically on subsequent days.
|
|
|
Post by Balon Blackbriar on Oct 18, 2018 22:16:02 GMT 1
Balon might have some Milk of the poppy before the dance. With hilarious results.
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 18, 2018 23:19:59 GMT 1
Post by Ashara Starkwood on Oct 18, 2018 23:19:59 GMT 1
Lucky for me, my target is Lord Ilyn not Lady Maegelle.... she can hate me as much as she want so long as he caves. I mean, things might get uglier between us, but that can all be good fun, too.
That's not exactly how this is going to go, you scared the little puppy into hiding between momma's skirts for this one. The alternative would be her sitting there and mollifying away every bit of damage you do, which would be tiresome. But hey, win this one and Ashara gets what she wants, lose and Maegelle gets what she wants. Quit and it's game on. Ooh the old switcheroo. I mean, it's effectively like Lord Ilyn Quit and Lady Maegelle started a new intrigue, so not like anything rule-breaking.
Though I would point out that uless Lord Ilyn has deceptively high intrigue stats the every-other-round limitation on mollify would I think still give Ashara the edge. Well, whatever, if I expected an easy time, i wouldn't have opted into this particular plotline!
(In hindsight I could have DPd the streetwise roll for an extra +1b to almost guarantee that I hit the 12 - a 2+ would have done it)
|
|
|
Post by Father on Oct 18, 2018 23:22:54 GMT 1
Finding the most capable NPC schemers must run in the family.
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 18, 2018 23:36:02 GMT 1
Post by Father on Oct 18, 2018 23:36:02 GMT 1
You would actually be going up against head of house benefit trying to have him cancel the bethrothal, and that's a serious booster to Ilyn's off the shelf secondary character stats, so him backed by Maegelle with that should be tougher. Him alone vs Ashara with head of house kicking in is probably tilted in his favor. Though he probably have less raw punching power and wouldn't bring out the high stake objective.
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 19, 2018 5:13:48 GMT 1
Post by Addam Velaryon on Oct 19, 2018 5:13:48 GMT 1
In the book it says I can spend a fatigue at any point. Could I spend one during last rounds attacks to ignore Armor Penalty? It would drop HK and SSs down to 1 degree. Not sure how to math would play out for the SSs but I wouldn't need to take an injury from HK and that wound would drop to an injury.
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 19, 2018 5:16:09 GMT 1
Post by Ashara Starkwood on Oct 19, 2018 5:16:09 GMT 1
You can spend it at any point, but you can only affect future rolls; that is one of the differences between fatigue and destiny points. fatigue has to be declared before you roll, DPs can be spent to alter a roll after you have made it.
EDIT:
Conditional: Will spend a point of fatigue to eliminate the AP penalty if it will knock a SS attack down a degree. Ok, so in this case you would have to decide before the enemy rolls whether or not to take the fatigue; on the upside, it would affect ALL instances of your AP for a full round, so all attacks against you would be at the higher CD, if you get knocked down again the test to stand would not have AP applied, etc. (in this case the full round would be end of your turn to end of next turn).
|
|
|
OOC II
Oct 19, 2018 5:30:33 GMT 1
Post by Addam Velaryon on Oct 19, 2018 5:30:33 GMT 1
Couldn't I just burn it before the HK attacks and still get the benefits for the attacks? How should I word my Conditional to get the most use out of it or is it something Im just going to have to burn before Father rolls the dice and just hope for the best (Which I will do if thats the case for round 2 attacks)
Nvm you answered it in your edit. I will fix up my post. Thanks!
|
|